Concept
Observer
Notice irritation rising and there seems to be a little distance between the feeling and the one who sees it. “Observer” is a name for that apparent standpoint within experience. It can be useful because a thought or emotion that is seen does not have to carry us away at once.
The useful distance becomes a deeper question when the observer itself is examined. Is it a separate self, a temporary function of attention, or something deeper than personality? Jiddu Krishnamurti presses the question further: if the observer is built from memory, judgment, and past experience, it may not be separate from what it observes.
This is why the observer connects psychological noticing with non-dual inquiry and critiques of inner division. Each begins with the possibility of seeing experience clearly. They separate over whether clarity requires a witness, reveals one, or dissolves the division between watcher and watched.
Words used here
Plain meanings for words on this page.
observer
A way of speaking about the part of experience that can notice thoughts and feelings. Traditions disagree about whether this observer is ultimately a separate self, a temporary function, or something deeper.
awareness
The capacity to notice experience—thoughts, sensations, feelings, perceptions—without immediately becoming lost in them.
Continue from here
Open a related page.
Follow Krishnamurti's critiqueHe questions whether the observer is separate from what it observes.Open Jiddu Krishnamurti →Jiddu Krishnamurti
Person
Compare with Jung's egoJung keeps a psychological subject while exploring depths beyond it.Open Carl Jung →Carl Jung
Person
Return to awarenessIf “observer” feels abstract, awareness names the same noticing in simpler language.Open Awareness →Awareness
Idea
Sources
What this reading rests on
Freedom from the Known
original work
Krishnamurti examines whether the psychological observer is actually separate from the thoughts and feelings being observed.